GROUND WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT USING WATER QUALITY INDEX: CASE STUDY OF AYUB AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FAISALABAD, PAKISTAN

Authors

  • Sumreen Siddiq Principal Scientist, Biochemistry Section, Post Harvest Research Centre, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Muhammad Aleem Sarwar Principal Scientist, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Quais Affan Senior Scientist, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, AARI, Faisalabad Author
  • Zia Chishti Principal Scientist, Soil Fertility Field Wing, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Hina Nazir Scientific Officer, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Faraz Anwar Scientific Officer, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Kamra Mehmood Senior Scientist, Plant Pathology Research Institute, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Hafsa Zafar Senior Scientist, Soil Chemistry Section, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Arfan-ul-Haq Senior Scientist, Soil Chemistry Section, AARI, Faisalabad. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.4.1147

Keywords:

Water quality index, irrigation, SAR, EC, infiltration rates, Pakistan

Abstract

Poor water quality index for groundwater in Pakistan is a pressing issue due to the increasing population, rapid urbanization, and industrialization. This has resulted in fertile and productive soil being converted to barren land, leading to significant reductions in infiltration rates and agricultural productivity. The aim of the study was to assess water quality monitoring in research areas of AARI using Water Quality Index (WQI) during the year 2023-24. Collected water samples (12 different sites) were analyzed at Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, Faisalabad for WQI by using various physicochemical characteristics like EC, TDS, Cl, SAR and RSC. Electrical Conductivity (EC) for all 12 samples varied between 787 to 3529 µS/cm. On the basis of Fitness criteria water samples from only 2 sites S1 and S8 were under “fit” category, 3 sites (S4, S5, S12) were under “marginally fit” and remaining all samples were “unfit” for Irrigation because of high salt concentration (EC > 1250 µS cm -1 ). The WQI values obtained from the research areas ranged from 68.05 to 354.4. Samples were classified using the WQI classification criteria and it revealed that only 25% of the samples of the area were categorized as “good (WQI range 50-100),” 50% were rated as “poor” (WQI range 101-200), and the remaining 25% were classified as “very poor” (WQI range 201-300) quality water.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Muhammad Aleem Sarwar, Principal Scientist, Soil and Water Testing Laboratory for Research, AARI, Faisalabad.

     

     

References

Abbasnia, A., M. Alimohammadi, A.H. Mahvi, R. Nabizadeh, M. Yousefi, A.A. Mohammadi, H. Pasalari and M. Mirzabeigi. 2018. Assessment of groundwater quality and evaluation of scaling and corrosiveness potential of drinking water samples in villages of Chabahr city, Sistan and Baluchistan province in Iran. Data in Brief, 16: pp. 182-192

Aivazidou, E., N. Tsolakis, E. Iakovou, D. Vlachos, 2016. The emerging role of water footprint in supply chain management: a critical literature synthesis and a hierarchical decision-making framework. J. Clean. Prod. 137: 1018-1037.

Ali, S., M. Rizwan, M.F. Qayyum, O.K. YS, M. Ibrahim, M. Riaz, F. Arif, M. Hafeez, I. Al Wabel, A.N. Shahzad, 2017. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci. Pollut Res. Int. 24(14):1–9.

Alver, A. 2019. Evaluation of conventional drinking water treatment plant efficiency according to water quality index and health risk assessment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, (27225-27238). APHA 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th edition. American Health Public Association, Washington, DC.

Brown, R.M., R.A., McClelland, N.I., Deininger, Tozer, R.G. 1970. A water quality index: do we dare? Water and sewage work 117: 339-343.

Dotaniya, M.L., V.D. Meena, J.K. Saha, C.K. Dotaniya, A.E.D Mahmoud, B.L. Meena, M.D. Meena, R.C Sanwal, R.S. Meena, R.K. Doutaniya, S. Praveen, L. Manju, L. and P.K. Rai, 2022. Reuse of poor-quality water for sustainable crop production in the changing scenario of climate. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25: 7345–737.

Egbuikwem, P.N., G.C. Obiechefu, F.I. Hai, M.C.E. Devanadera, and D.P. Saroj, 2021. Potential of suspended growth biological processes for mixed wastewater reclamation and reuse in agriculture: challenges and opportunities. Environmental Technology Reviews.10:77-110

Flynn, R. 2009. Irrigation water Analysis and interpretation. Guide W-102. New Mexico U.S. State University and the Department of Agriculture. P-1-4.

Forni, C., D. Duca, B.R. Glick, 2017. Mechanisms of plant response to salt and drought stress and their alteration by rhizobacteria. Plant Soil. 410 (1-2):335–356.

Grattan, S. 2002. Irrigation Water Salinity and Crop Production. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Hasan, S.W., H. Liu, V. Naddeo, S. Puig, N.Y. Yip, 2020. Environmental the Technologies for Sustainable Development of the Water and Energy Sectors. Ist edition, IWA Publishing, London, UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/9781789062328.

Javed, Z., S. Chand, and R. Amer, 2020. Geospatial quality in the analysis of groundwater major cities of Pakistan. Desalination and Water Treatment. P: 61-70.

Kahlown, M. A. and A. D. Kahn 2002. Irrigation Water Quality Manual. Pakistan Council of Research in Water Resources, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Khattak, M. A., N. Ahmed, M.A. Qazi, A. Izhar, S. Ilyas, M.N. Chaudhary, S.A. Khan, N. Iqbal, and T. waheed, 2012. Evaluation of ground water quality for irrigation and drinking purposes of the areas adjacent to Hudiara industrial drain, Lahore, Pakistan. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol. 49(4), 549-556.

Malik, D.M., M.A. Khanand, and T.A. Chaudhry, 1984. Analysis manual for soils plants and and water. Soil Soil Testing Fertility Institute, Survey Lahore. Rehman, N., A. Wajid, S. Muhammad, and Y.T. Kuwait, 2024. Evaluation of drinking and irrigation water quality, and potential risks indices in the Dera Ismail Khan district, Pakistan. J. of Sci. Volume 51 (1).

RezaieBalf, M., N.A. Fathollahzadeh A. Mohammadzadeh, M.A. Murti, A.N. Ahmed, C.M. Fai, N. Nabipour, S. Alaghmand, and A. El-Shafie, 2020. Physicochemical parameters data assimilation for efficient improvement of water quality index prediction: comparative assessment of a noise suppression hybridization approach. J. Cleaner. Prod., 271: 122576.

Sahu, P. and P.K. Sikdar, 2008. Hydrochemical framework of the aquifer in and around East Kolkata Wetlands, West Bengal, India Environ. Geol, 55: J. Agric. Res. 2025, 63(4) 823-835

Tyagi, S., B. Sharma, P. Singh, R. Dobhal 2013. Water quality assessment in terms of water quality index. Am. J. Water Resour. 1:34–38.

Uddin, G., S. Nash and A. Olbert 2021. A review of water quality index models and their use for assessing surface water quality, Ecological Indicators. 122:107218.

United States Salinity Laboratory Staff. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. USDA Handbook 60. Washington, D.C. pp. 89-91.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

GROUND WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT USING WATER QUALITY INDEX: CASE STUDY OF AYUB AGRICULTURE RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FAISALABAD, PAKISTAN. (2026). Journal of Agricultural Research (JAR) ., 63(4), 323-332. https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.4.1147