NEEM AND SULFUR-COATED UREA ENHANCE GROWTH AND SUGAR YIELD OF SUGARCANE BY INCREASING NITROGEN USE EFFICINECY

Authors

  • Abdul Majeed Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, AARI, Faisalabad Translator
  • Naeem Iqbal Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, AARI, Faisalabad. Author
  • Muhammad Shahzad Afzal Scientific Officer, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Muhammad Akhlaq Mudassar Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Abdul Khaliq Scientific Officer, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Mahmood-UL- Hassan Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Muhammad Shafique Scientific Officer, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad.. Author
  • Babar Hussain Babar Principal Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Syed Saqlain Hussain Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author
  • Naeem Fiaz Senior Scientist, Sugarcane Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.3.1150

Keywords:

Saccharum officinarum, coated urea, cane girth, cane height, nitrogen, sugarcane yield, sugar recovery, Pakistan

Abstract

The use of nitrogen (N) fertilizers is important for improving agricultural productivity, especially in the cultivation of sugarcane. Traditional urea, generally used as N source, has several limitations, including high nutrient losses and environmental pollution. Alternative urea forms, such as NCU (neem coated urea) and SCU (sulfur coated urea) have been investigated by researchers to overcome these issues. The purpose of this field experiment is to evaluate how SCU and NCU affect sugarcane production and N agronomic efficiency. Field trial was conducted during the year 2020 to 2022 at sugarcane farm area to compare the performance of this coated urea with traditional urea in sugarcane farming. In SCU treated field 12% and 10% higher sugarcane yield noted in plant and ratoon crop, correspondingly over traditional urea treatments. Similarly 15% higher sugar yield was recorded in SCU treatments as compared to traditional urea. The results indicated that SCU exhibited 25% in plant and 16% in ratoon crop higher N agronomic efficiency than traditional urea. These results suggest that the use of SCU can be a viable strategy to enhance sugarcane yield and improve the economic sustainability of the sugar industry while minimizing environmental impacts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alimohammadi, M., E. Panahpour, and A. Naseri. 2020. Assessing the effects of urea and nano-nitrogen chelate fertilizers on sugarcane yield and dynamic of nitrate in soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 66(2): 352–359.

Chen, J.C. and C.C. Chou. 1993. Cane sugar handbook: a manual for cane sugar manufacturers and their chemists. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA.

Dobermann, A. 2005. Nitrogen use efficiency-state of the art. IFA international workshop on enhanced efficiency fertilizers. Frankfurt, Germany. June 28–30. http://I/soilfertility. rml.edu/Materials%20to%20include!Nitro gen%20use%20efficiency%20state%20 of0/o20the%20ar_Dobermann.pdf.

Fageria, N. K., V. C. Baliger and C. A. Jones. 1997. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. 2nd ed. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker, Inc.

Garcia-Montiel, D.C., E.L.M. Coutinho and G.T. Pereira. 2017. Nitrogen losses by volatilization in sugarcane harvested green or burned. Sci. Agric. 74(5): 398–405.

Gupta, R.K., R. Singh and P. Aggarwal. 2017. Neem-coated urea improves sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) yield, quality, and profits in the subtropical cane-growing region. Sugar Tech. 19(2): 139–147.

Janke, L., A.F Leite, K. Batista, W. Silva, M. Nikolausz, M. Nelles, and W. Stinner. 2016. Enhancing biogas production from vinasse in sugarcane biorefineries: Effects of urea and trace elements supplementation on process performance and stability. Bioresour. Technol. 217: 10–20.

Kabiraj, R.C., M.S. Islam, M.N. Siidiqui and A. Siddika. 2017. Effect of intercrop green manuring and nitrogen on the growth, yield and quality of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum Agrofor. Environ. 11: L.). J. 257–260.

Kumar, S., S.K. Singh, and M. Rai. 2021. Potential of neem coated urea in agricultural and environmental sustainability: J. Environ. Manage. A review. 282: 111989.

Lagos, H.J.M. 2022. Evaluating the effect of coated urea and urea-ammonium-nitrate solution on cane tonnage, sugar yield and leaf-soil nitrogen content under Louisiana sugarcane production system. M.Sc. Thesis, Louisiana State Univ. and Agric. & Mech. Coll., Louisiana, USA.

Majeed, A., I. Rashid. A. Niaz, A. Ditta, A. Sameen, A.A. Al-Huqail. and M.H. Siddiqui. 2022. Balanced use of Zn, Cu, Fe, and B improves the yield and sucrose contents of sugarcane juice cultivated in sandy clay loam soil. Agronomy. 12(3): 696.

Mishra, V.K., R.K. Sharma and R. Chaturvedi. 2016. Effect of slow-release neem-coated urea on nitrogen use efficiency and yield of sugarcane. Sugar Tech. 18(2): 200–206.

Mishra, V.K., R.K. Srivastava and R.S. Tripathi. 2018. Effect of neem coated urea on growth and yield of sugarcane in sandy loam soil. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7(9): 1257–1264.

Page, A.L., R.H. Miller and D.R. Keeny. 1982. Methods of soil analysis (Part 2). In Chemical and Microbiological Properties; Agronomy 9; SSSA: Madison, WI, USA.

Rathnappriya, R.H.K., K. Sakai, K. Okamoto, S. Kimura, T. Haraguchi, T. Nakandakari, H. Setouchi, and W.B.M.A.C. Bandara. 2022. Examination of the effectiveness of controlled release fertilizer to balance sugarcane yield and reduce nitrate leaching to groundwater. Agronomy. 12(3): 695.

Reddy, B.R., K.K. Rao, and I. Srinivas. 2019. Effect of sulfur-coated urea on yield attributes and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrid complex) in South Telangana zone of Andhra Pradesh. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 8(4): 1134–1138.

Rowell, D. L. 1994. Soil science. Methods and application. UK: Longman Scientific & Technical. Ryan, J., G. Estefan and A. Rashid. 2001. Soil and Plant Analysis Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Aleppo, Syria.

Sharma, N., V.K. Mishra, and R.K. Srivastava. 2020. Effect of slow-release sulphur coated urea on sugarcane quality parameters in sandy loam soil. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 8(2): 697–701.

Sharma, P., V.K. Sharma and R.K. Sharma. 2018. Impact of controlled release sulphur coated urea on yield attributes and economics of sugarcane (Saccharum spp. complex) in Kharif season. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 7(1): 1603–1607.

Spencer, G.L. and G.P. Meade.1963. Cane Sugar Hand Book, 9th ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA.

Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie, and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical approach, 3rd ed. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, USA.

Staff, U.S.S.L. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook. 60:83-100.

Yang, J., C. Xue and C. Li. 2017. Effects of sulfur coated urea on soil enzyme activities, nutrient availability, and nitrogen utilization of maize. J. Integr. Agric. 16(9): 1965–1972.

Zheng, W., C. Sui, Z. Liu, J. Geng, X. Tian, X.Yang, C. Li and M. Zhang. 2016. Long-term effects of controlled-release urea on crop yields and soil fertility under wheat–corn double cropping systems. Agron. J. 108(4): 1703–1716

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

NEEM AND SULFUR-COATED UREA ENHANCE GROWTH AND SUGAR YIELD OF SUGARCANE BY INCREASING NITROGEN USE EFFICINECY. (2025). Journal of Agricultural Research (JAR) ., 63(3), 231-237. https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.3.1150