GENDER PERSPECTIVE OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITIES IN THE AGRARIAN COMMUNITIES OF SEMI-ARID AREAS IN THE PUNJAB, PAKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58475/2025.63.2.1170Keywords:
Climate change, gender, perspective, arid zone, vulnerability indicator, households, perception, PakistanAbstract
Pakistan is one of the most vulnerable countries in the world due to extreme climate change events. However, it is important to know about the perceptions about climate change vulnerabilities in the rural areas from rural communities to overcome the climate changes related challenges. Gender remains an important social factor and the effects of climate change are felt in a different way for women and men therefore, adaptation intervention also need to be gendered. In this perspective, this study was conducted to find out the gender wise perception of climate change as well as vulnerability and adaptive capacity in the context of climate change. A cross-sectional survey of the male and female respondents was conducted from 24 villages of semi-arid areas of the Punjab, Pakistan. Data collection was conducted during 2023 in two semi-arid districts of Punjab Pakistan one from Layyah and other from Bhakkar district. Multistage random sampling technique was used to select a size of 360 households. Both male and female members of the households were interviewed to have a gender perspective. A total of 720 respondents (30 from each selected village: 15 Males and 15 Females) were taken as the study sample. This survey was supplemented with 25 key informant interviews. The data were analyzed descriptive statistical analysis used. For comparison, the independent samples t-test was used to compare the mean scores of both genders for a given variable. The results indicate that the female respondents perceived that in the past 10 years the summer heat waves have increased and rainfall has decreased as compared to their previous years experiences. Due to climate change impacts extreme cold wave have also increased which destroyed standing crops, vegetables and high risk of disease attacks plants and livestock. During drought and dry spell most of the crops were also destroyed due to shortage of water. Due to climate change impacts irregular rain fall also effected the seasonality of the crops and some crops could not be cultivated. Results also show that the sampled households get their food form their own farms to fulfill their basic food needs thus in case when any natural disaster occur they cannot fulfill the demand of food and face shortage of food. “Household got food from their own farmland” got mean values 4.07 and 3.31 for male and female respondents respectively. There was a significant difference between male and female respondents with t-value 7.764. During any natural disaster female member suffer more for collection of water from far areas. “Household with consistent water supply during natural disaster” had values 2.74 and 3.02 for male and female respondents respectively. The tendency for male respondents was rarely to sometimes, while for female respondents it was between sometime to often there was significant difference between male and female respondents with t-value 2.881. The overall results also indicate that most of the household rely on natural resources and they face difficulty during any natural climate change event occur.
Downloads
References
Alston, M. Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Women’s Studies International Forum, 2014. Elsevier. 47(2): 287-294.
Aslam, A. B. I. A. Rana, S. S. Shah and G. Mohuddin. 2022. Climate change and glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) risk perceptions: An empirical study of Ghizer District, Gilgit Baltistan Pakistan. International journal of disaster risk reduction. 83(4):103392.
Banerjee, R.R. 2015. Farmers’ perception of climate change, impact and adaptation strategies: a case study of four villages in the semi-arid regions of India. Natural Hazards. 75(3): 2829-2845.
Bastakoti, R.C., L. Bharati, U. Bhattarai and S.M. Wahid. 2017. Agriculture under changing climate conditions and adaptation options in the Koshi Basin. Climate and Development. 9(7): 634-648.
Bocchiola, D., L. Brunetti, A. Soncini, F. Polinelli and M. Gianinetto. 2019. Impact of climate change on agricultural productivity and food security in the Himalayas: A case study in Nepal. Agricultural systems. 171(5): 113-125.
Clarke, C., S. Shackleton and M. Powell. 2012. Climate change perceptions, drought responses and views on carbon farming amongst commercial livestock and game farmers in the semiarid Great Fish River Valley, Eastern Cape province, South Africa. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 29(1): 13-23.
Fahad, S. and J. Wang. 2018. Farmers’ risk perception, vulnerability, and adaptation to climate change in rural Pakistan. Land use policy. 79(4): 301-309.
Farah, N., S. Siddiqui, S. Afzal, S.M.A. Gillani, A. Bakhsh and M. Touseef. 2023. CLIMATE-INDUCED MIGRATION AND ASSOCIATED RISKS IN PAKISTAN: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Russian Law Journal. 11(12): 785-786.
Farooqi, A.B., A.H. Khan and H. Mir. 2005. Climate change perspective in Pakistan. Pak. j. meteorol. 2(3).
Frank, D., M. Reichstein, M. Bahn, K. Thonicke, D. Frank, M.D. Mahecha, P. Smith, M. Van Der Velde, S. Vicca and F. Babst. 2015. Effects of climate extremes on the terrestrial carbon cycle: concepts, processes and potential future impacts. Global change biology. 21(8): 2861-2880.
Gahlawat, I. N., and P. Lakra. 2020. Global Climate change and its effects. Integrated Journal of Social Sciences 7(1): 14-23.
IPCC. (2001). Climate change 2001: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change third assessment report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Working Group II contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change fourth assessment report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jalal, M. J. E., M. A. Khan, M. E. Hossain, S. Yedla, and G. M. Alam. 2021. Does climate change stimulate household vulnerability and income diversity? Evidence from southern coastal region of Bangladesh. Heliyon 7(9).
Khan, I. and Z. Rahman. 2016. E-tail brand experience’s influence on e-brand trust and e-brand loyalty: The moderating role of gender. Int. j. retail distrib. manag. 44(6): 588-606.
Kong, M., H. Zhong, Y. Wu, G. Liu, Y. Xu and G. Wang. 2019. Developing and validating intrinsic groundwater vulnerability maps in regions with limited data: a case study from Datong City in China using DRASTIC and Nemerow pollution indices. Environmental Earth Sciences. 78(3):1-14.
Magalhães, H.F., I.S. Feitosa, E. De Lima Araújo and U.P. Albuquerque. 2021. Perceptions of risks related to climate change in agroecosystems in a semi-arid region of Brazil. Human Ecology. 49(5): 403-413.
Mishra, A.K. and V.O. Pede. 2017. Perception of climate change and adaptation strategies in Vietnam: J. of are there intra-household gender differences? Int. Clim. Chang. 9(4): 501-516.
Mthethwa, S., and E. Wale. 2023. Household vulnerability to climate change in South Africa: A multilevel regression model. Development Southern Africa 40(2): 466-481.
Nadeem, F. B. Jacobs and D. Cordell. 2022. Mapping agricultural vulnerability to impacts of climate events of Punjab, Pakistan. Regional environmental change. 22(3):66.
Ofori, B. Y., A. J. Stow, J. B. Baumgartner, and L. J. Beaumont. 2017. Influence of adaptive capacity on the outcome of climate change vulnerability assessment. Scientific reports 7(1): 12979.
Phuong, T. T., N. Q. Tan, N. T. Hai, and N. H. Ngu. 2023. Reframing climate change resilience: an intersectional perspective of ethnicity and gender from Vietnam. Climate 11(4): 85.
Quisumbing, A.R., R. Meinzen-Dick, T.L. Raney, A. Croppenstedt, J.A. Behrman and A. Peterman. 2014. Closing the knowledge gap on gender in agriculture. Gender in agriculture: Closing the knowledge gap.4(2): 3-27.
Rühlemann, A. and J.C. Jordan. 2021. Risk perception and culture: implications for vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Disasters. 45(2): 424-452.
Saeed, S., M. S. A. Makhdum, S. Anwar, and M. R. Yaseen. 2023. Climate change vulnerability, adaptation, and feedback hypothesis: a comparison of lower-middle, upper-middle, and high income countries. Sustainability 15(5): 4145.
Sultana, H., N. Ali, M.M. Iqbal and A.M. Khan. 2009. Vulnerability and adaptability of wheat production in different climatic zones of Pakistan under climate change scenarios. Climatic change. 94(4):123-142.
Syed, A., T. Raza, T.T. Bhatti and N.S. Eash. 2022. Climate Impacts on the agricultural sector of Pakistan: Risks and solutions. Environmental Challenges. 6(2):100433.
Upadhyay, R. K. 2024. Markers for global climate change and its impact on social, biological and ecological systems: A review. American Journal of Climate Change 9(03): 159.
Zheng, Y., L. Capra, O. Wolfson and H. Yang. 2014. Urban computing: concepts, methodologies, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST). 5(3):1-55.

HEC Recognised Y- Category Journal