YIELD PERFORMANCE AND DISEASE RESPONSE OF NOVEL TOMATO HYBRIDS UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Ariba Shamail M.phil Student, Plant Breeding & Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology, Faisalabad. Author
  • Abdul Rehman Khan Principal Scientist, Plant Breeding & Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology, Faisalabad. Author
  • Amjad Hameed Deputy Chief Scientist, Plant Breeding & Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology, Faisalabad. Author
  • Saba Akram Senior Scientist, Plant Breeding & Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology, Faisalabad. Author
  • Khalid Pervaiz Akhtar Deputy Chief Scientist, Plant Protection Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad. Author
  • Madiha Shafique M.phil Student, Plant Breeding & Genetics Division, Nuclear Institute for Agriculture & Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58475/pynahy04

Keywords:

Solanum lycopersicum, commercial check, heterosis, agronomic performance, genetic diversity, virus tolerance, Pakistan

Abstract

The study was conducted at the at vegetable research area of Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (NIAB), Faisalabad, Pakistan, during 2024–25 to develop and evaluate newly developed tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids for yield performance and disease tolerance. Eleven new hybrids, including a commercial check (Marjan), were tested in a randomized complete block design with three replications under field conditions. Significant differences were observed among genotypes for vegetative, reproductive and yield traits. Hybrid NBH-714 produced the highest yield (3.0 kg plant-1; 34.3 t ha-1), followed by NBH-715 and NBH-691. Standard heterosis varied from -0.73 to 66.6%, indicating strong hybrid vigor in several crosses. All hybrids were susceptible to early blight, while NBH-721 showed the lowest late blight index (29.7%). Yield-related traits contributed most to genetic variability based on principal component analysis. Overall, NBH-714, NBH-715 and NBH-691 exhibited superior yield potential and are recommended for commercial evaluation and breeding improvement under local agro-climatic conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, N., F.S. Hamid, A. Waheed, M.A. Khan, S. Khan, I. Ahmed, S. Aslam, S. Mumtaz and H.J.M.J. Gul. 2017. Evaluation of different tomato hybrids for phenotypic variation and yield contributing attributes at Mansehra. J. Chem. Res. 5:305–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48317/ IMIST.PRSM/morjchem-v5i2.7556

Akhtar, K., M. Saleem, Q. Iqbal, M. Asghar, A. Hameed and N. Sarwar. 2016. Evaluation of tomato genotypes for late blight resistance using low tunnel assay. J. Plant Pathol. 98:421–428. DOI: 10.4454/JPP.V98I3.002

Ali, S., R. Rasheed, M. Qazi, U. Rafiq and H. Akhtar. 2023. Enhancing rhizosphere bacterial activity against bacterial wilt of tomato (Ralstonia solanacearum) using biochar. J. Agric. Biol. 1:61–69. DOI: 10.55627/agribiol.001.02.0651

Ali, T., S.J. Butt, I.N. Zia-ul-Haq, F. Abbas and R. Ijaz. 2023. Characterization and performance evaluation of tomato genotypes grown under unheated greenhouse condition. Pure Appl. Biol. 12:326–341. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.19045/bspab.2023.120035

Atherton, J. and J. Rudich. 2012. The Tomato Crop: A Scientific Basis for Improvement. Springer, New York.

Avdikos, I.D., G.M. Nteve, A. Apostolopoulou, R. Tagiakas, I. Mylonas, I.N. Xynias, F. Papathanasiou, P. Kalaitzis and A.G. Mavromatis. 2021. Analysis of re-heterosis for yield and fruit quality in restructured hybrids generated from crossings among tomato recombinant lines. Agronomy. 11:822. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050822

Aydın, E., M.A. Cengiz, L. Demirsoy and H. Demirsoy. 2025. A hybrid analytical framework for cracking and some fruit quality features in sweet cherries. Horticulturae. 11:709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11060709

Bihon, W., K.E. Ognakossan, J.B. Tignegre, P. Hanson, K. Ndiaye and R. Srinivasan. 2022. Evaluation of different tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) entries and varieties for performance and adaptation in Mali, West Africa. Horticulturae. 8:579. DOI:https:// doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae8070579

Bora, L., Sudesh, D.S. Duhan, Ravika, Sapana Gurupad Hegde, Tanvi Mehta, K.R. Aishwarya, Hardeep and P. Pahal. 2025. Fruit yield and quality traits interrelationship studies in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Vegetos. (original article published 06 August 2025; correction issued 23 Sept 2025). DOI: 10.1007/s42535-025-01381-0

Chusreeaeom, K. 2014. Characterization and genetic mapping of tomato mutants exhibiting elongated fruit shapes, isolated from micro-tom mutant collection.

Çelik, İ., S. Aydın, H.C. Kayıkçi, A. Ünlü, E. Gümrükçü, N. Çelik, Y. Doğan and S.M. Sülü. 2023. Evaluation of the relations between yield and yield components of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids by correlation and path analysis. Horticultural Studies. 40(2):49–54. DOI: 10.16882/hortis.1283084

Esengun, K., G. Erdal, O. Gündüz and H. Erdal. 2007. An economic analysis and energy use in stake-tomato production in Tokat province of Turkey. Renew. Energy. 32:1873–1881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.07.005

Farshadfar, E., M. Rashidi, M.M. Jowkar and H. Zali. 2013. GGE Biplot analysis of genotype-environment interaction in chickpea genotypes. European Journal of Experimental Biology. 3(1):1963–1971.

Hassan, M., T. Ashraf, M. Asim, B.A. Khan, M.A. Nadeem, M.U. Naseer, M. Adnan, M. Asif, A. Ali and A. Nijabat. 2021. Evaluation of different varieties of tomato for growth and seed quality in district Sargodha climate. Plant Cell Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. 22:533–545.

Government of Pakistan. 2024. Fruits, Vegetables and Condiments Statistics of Pakistan. Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Ghosh, S., H. Avinashe, N. Dubey, G.P. Sharadhi, K. Danalakoti, S. Sachan and S. Choudhary. 2023. PCA-based multivariate approach for segmentation of variance in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea [L.] Czern & Coss). SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 55(6):1963–1971. DOI: http:// doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2023.55.6.10

Khokhar, K.M. and N. HRI. 2013. Present status and prospects of tomatoes in Pakistan. Agric. Corner – Farmers to Global Market. 1–21.

King, R.C. 2013. Handbook of Genetics: Plants, Plant Viruses, and Protists. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.

Kumar, E.R., V. Bahadur, V. Prasad and A. Kerketta. 2021. Evaluation of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) genotypes for growth, yield and quality traits at different planting density. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 10:3575–3582. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2021.1001.422

Kumar, R., K.S. Kumar, S. Jaggal and R.K. Singh. 2012. Heterosis for yield and yield components in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Electron. J. Plant Breed. 3:800–805.

Laranjeira, T., A. Costa, C. Faria-Silva, D. Ribeiro, J.M.P.F. de Oliveira, S. Simões and A. Ascenso. 2022. Sustainable valorization of tomato by products to obtain bioactive compounds: Their potential in inflammation and cancer management. Molecules. 27:1701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27051701

Liu, Z., J. Jiang, A. Ren, X. Xu, H. Zhang, T. Zhao, X. Jiang, Y. Sun, J. Li and H. Yang. 2021. Heterosis and combining ability analysis of fruit yield, early maturity, and quality in tomato. Agronomy. 11:807. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040807

Mishra, A., A. Nandi, V. Thriveni, S. Das, I. Mohanty and S. Pattanayak. 2021. Heterosis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) hybrids for growth, yield and quality traits. Plant Improv. 10:220–229.

Peterson, D.G., S.M. Stack, H.J. Price and J.S. Johnston. 1996. DNA content of heterochromatin and euchromatin in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) pachytene chromosomes. DOI: Genome. 39:77–82. https://doi.org/10.1139/g96-011

Rasheed, A., M. Ilyas, T.N. Khan, A. Mahmood, U. Riaz, M.B. Chattha, N.A.T. Al Kashgry, N. Binothman, M.U. Hassan and Z. Wu. 2023. Study of genetic variability, heritability, and genetic advance for yield-related traits in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill.). Front. Genet. 13:1030309. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.1030309

Remzeena, A., T.P. Pradeepkumar, A. Aswini, V.I. Beena and E.V. Anoop. 2023. Evaluation of tomato hybrids for growth, yield and quality attributes under the climatic conditions of Kerala. Biol. Forum – Int. J. 15:370–375.

Saiful Islam, A.F.M., M.S.A. Khan and R. Tabassum. 2016. Yield and yield attributing traits of some selected genotypes of tomato for early summer cultivation in Bangladesh. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 12:24–32.

Safi, H., S. Hussain, M. Shahid and M. Nazir. 2020. Incidence and severity of early blight of tomato in Peshawar, Mardan and Malakand divisions and variability amongst the isolates of Alternaria solani Jones and Mart. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 13:175–183. DOI: 10.30954/0974-1712.02.2020.9

Saleem, M.Y., K.P. Akhtar, Q. Iqbal, M. Asghar, A. Hameed and M. Shoaib. 2016. Development of tomato hybrids with multiple disease tolerance. Pak. J. Bot. 48:771–778.

Saleem, M.Y., M. Asghar, M.A. Haq, T. Rafique, A. Kamran and A.A. Khan. 2009. Genetic analysis to identify suitable parents for hybrid seed production in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Pak. J. Bot. 41:1107–1116.

Sanida, M.V., T. Sanida, A. Sideris and M. Dasygenis. 2023. An efficient hybrid CNN classification model for tomato crop disease. Technologies. 11:10. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3390/technologies11010010

Wang, Y., R. Xiao, Y. Yin and T. Liu. 2021. Prediction of tomato yield in Chinese-style solar greenhouses based on wavelet neural networks and genetic algorithms. Information. 12:336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/info12080336

Downloads

Published

2026-01-06

How to Cite

YIELD PERFORMANCE AND DISEASE RESPONSE OF NOVEL TOMATO HYBRIDS UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS. (2026). Journal of Agricultural Research (JAR) ., 63(4), 293-305. https://doi.org/10.58475/pynahy04